What do the six "weekly orders" that the Texas Supreme Court published on March 2 share in common? The defendants won every case. Imagine our surprise.
Barry Barnett
Recent Posts
- Firm that Vouched for Ponzi Scheme Slips Noose
- A Column About Nothing . . . But
- Annals of Arbitration: Fifth Circuit Proves Blawgletter Wrong (Sorta)
- Delaware Supremes Back Class Fix for Short Form Merger Mess
- Fees for Defending Arbitration Award?
- Quote of the Day: Harvard Law Record
- WSJ on Antitrust (Update)
- Antitrust Division Presumes "Reverse Payment" Deals Unlawful (Update)
- Seventh Circuit Swats Rule 23(f) Appeal; the Class Stands
- Who's Afraid of Google Books? Tra La La La La.
Blawgroll
- Above the Law
- Barnett's Notes on Commercial Litigation
- Deliberations
- Florida Injury Lawyer & Attorney
- Houston's Clear Thinkers
- International Lawyer Coach
- Legal Trade
- Litigation and Trial
- Pretrial, Trial and Appellate Advocacy Blog
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- set in style
- Supreme Court of Texas Blog
- Texas Appellate Law Blog
- Texas Law Blog
- Texas Probate Litigation
- Texas Small Business Law Blog
- The UCL Practitioner
- Vogel IT Law Blog
« Taxing Texas Class Actions | Main | Adventures in Forum non Conveniens »
March 04, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4f7053ef00d835753e9169e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not That It Matters:
The comments to this entry are closed.
Comments