When a party comes to us with nine grounds for reversing the district court, that usually means there are none.
Fifth Third Mortg. Co. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., No. 11-3795, slip op. at 1 (6th Cir. Aug. 30, 2012) (Kethledge, J.) (affirming summary judgment against title insurer whose agent defrauded lender and others).
That's a small number of grounds, most lawyers would come up with at least 20 grounds, in the alternative of course !
Posted by: James Swede | September 28, 2012 at 06:39 AM